In my opinion, it would be more correct to use this code
Code: Select all
Sys.n = [6 3 6 3 3];
Code: Select all
Sys.n = [6 3 1 1 1];
I think this problem can be solved as follows:
Code: Select all
Exp.mwFreq = 9.5;
Exp.CenterSweep = [339.4 8];
Exp.nPoints = 10000;
A_H = [-0.629 +0.181];
A_C = [+0.966 +0.966 +0.966 +0.966 +0.966 +0.966 -0.784 -0.784 -0.784 -0.784 -0.784 -0.784];
Sys.g = 2;
Sys.n = [6 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1];
Sys.A = mt2mhz([A_H A_C]);
Sys.Nucs = '1H,1H,C,C,C,C,C,C,C,C,C,C,C,C';
Sys.lwpp = [0, 0.01];
[x,y2] = garlic(Sys,Exp);
plot(x,y2);
The spectrum calculated in such a way is almost identical to the spectrum calculated by phenalenyl_manual.m example.
Moreover, in this case, one can see additional small peaks, which, in my opinion, are due to the species with more than one 13C.
Is it right? Any comments?