Effect of J and eeD on the powder spectrum with S=1/2
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 1:50 pm
Hello All!
I'm working on simulating powder spectra of low dimensional copper(II) lattices and I have a couple general questions I'm hoping you can answer.
The general code scheme I've been using is very simple with some number of S=1/2 ions with axial or rhombic gs thus:
Sys.S=[1/2 1/2 1/2....] I have tried 2-16 spins
Sys.g=[g1 g2 g3; G1, G2, G3,....] I have tried with all g=2; with g2=g3 and in all cases g1=G1, g2=G2, and g3=G3(all the spins are identical in all of my simulations).
Sys.J=[J12 J13 J14....] and for instance in the event I am attempting to simulate a chain of interacting copper(II) ions only nearest neighbors are interacting and thus J12 is nonzero J13 is 0....J23 is non zero J24 is 0..... etc.
I need to add also Sys.lwpp=1 but this brings me to my issue.
So heres the issue...
With all J=0 I get a very messy spectrum for 2 and 4 spins which doesnt really make sense to me. Shouldn't it look very similar to the one spin system if the g's are identical?
Upon changing J at all I am left with the same exact spectrum as when I am simulating a system with only one spin, no matter the size of J.
So, my question is regarding what J and, for instance, eeD, actually do to the spin system and thus to the spectrum. I see literature precedence for extracting J values from powder spectra,(only a few at X band which is what I am doing) however I havent been convinced it actually works.
Of course, in terms of single crystal studies J and eeD (superexchange and dipolar interactions) can be studied in terms of broadening or narrowing of the spectrum, however I don't see any effect like this on the simulated powder spectra.
Thank you for reading and Please approach me with suggestions or questions (about my parameters if I haven't been clear enough) if you can help, I really appreciate it!
Jeff
I'm working on simulating powder spectra of low dimensional copper(II) lattices and I have a couple general questions I'm hoping you can answer.
The general code scheme I've been using is very simple with some number of S=1/2 ions with axial or rhombic gs thus:
Sys.S=[1/2 1/2 1/2....] I have tried 2-16 spins
Sys.g=[g1 g2 g3; G1, G2, G3,....] I have tried with all g=2; with g2=g3 and in all cases g1=G1, g2=G2, and g3=G3(all the spins are identical in all of my simulations).
Sys.J=[J12 J13 J14....] and for instance in the event I am attempting to simulate a chain of interacting copper(II) ions only nearest neighbors are interacting and thus J12 is nonzero J13 is 0....J23 is non zero J24 is 0..... etc.
I need to add also Sys.lwpp=1 but this brings me to my issue.
So heres the issue...
With all J=0 I get a very messy spectrum for 2 and 4 spins which doesnt really make sense to me. Shouldn't it look very similar to the one spin system if the g's are identical?
Upon changing J at all I am left with the same exact spectrum as when I am simulating a system with only one spin, no matter the size of J.
So, my question is regarding what J and, for instance, eeD, actually do to the spin system and thus to the spectrum. I see literature precedence for extracting J values from powder spectra,(only a few at X band which is what I am doing) however I havent been convinced it actually works.
Of course, in terms of single crystal studies J and eeD (superexchange and dipolar interactions) can be studied in terms of broadening or narrowing of the spectrum, however I don't see any effect like this on the simulated powder spectra.
Thank you for reading and Please approach me with suggestions or questions (about my parameters if I haven't been clear enough) if you can help, I really appreciate it!
Jeff