Levels function-orientation of a single crystal
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:27 am
Dear Easy Spinner,
I use the levels function for calculation and fit. My crystal has a cubic spacegroup (Fd-3m), but the local point group of the paramagnetic ion is lower (D3d).
How is defined the molecular frame (zM orientation compared to the crystal orientation)? Without this information I do not know how to define properly the angles theta and phi in the argument of the levels function.
My opinion is that the crystal orientation does not matter in this calculation, only the local symmetry of the ion matters: if I assume zM is the local ion principal symmetry axis with respect to the external magnetic field (phi and theta in levels argument), I do not have to use any transformation of frames. Is this right or there is different notation?
This is very important to know because it has a serious effect on the absolute g factor value(s).
I use the levels function for calculation and fit. My crystal has a cubic spacegroup (Fd-3m), but the local point group of the paramagnetic ion is lower (D3d).
How is defined the molecular frame (zM orientation compared to the crystal orientation)? Without this information I do not know how to define properly the angles theta and phi in the argument of the levels function.
My opinion is that the crystal orientation does not matter in this calculation, only the local symmetry of the ion matters: if I assume zM is the local ion principal symmetry axis with respect to the external magnetic field (phi and theta in levels argument), I do not have to use any transformation of frames. Is this right or there is different notation?
This is very important to know because it has a serious effect on the absolute g factor value(s).