EasySpin forum

Hi all,

I want to simulate epr spectrum by using orca2easyspin. Then first I calculated epr tensors by orca (.prop file), and using orca2easyspin generate further data. I got such information:
Sys =
S: 1
xyz: [29X3 double]
Charge: 0
g: [2.0022 2.0028 2.0037]
gFrame: [0.1510 1.1134 -1.8332]
Nucs: 'N,C,H,C,H,N,C,C,C,C,C,H,C,N,H,H,H,C,C,C,H,C,H,C,H,C,H,C,N'
A: [29X3 double]
AFrame: [29X3 double]
Q: [29X3 double]
QFrame: [29X3 double]

to accelerate such simulation, i choose perturb method in pepper
Sys.lwpp =1; %mT
Exp.mwFreq =9.8; %GHz
Exp.Range = [315 368]; %mT
Opt.Method= 'perturb2';
[x,y]= pepper(Sys,Exp,Opt);


while three days passed, this work still in process. So i want to know are there any method to accelerate pepper process? My computer is linux system and 32 core, 128GB memory.


Thanks,
Best regards,
Sa

I suggest that spin system with 29 nuclei is extremely large. Firstly, all of C nuclei may be droped. Secondly, other nuclei with small HFC constants may be excluded too. The functions nucspinrmv or nucspinkeep may help in this. At third, I don't shure that perturbation method is appropriate choise for systems with S=1. I suggest that hybrid method should be used (matrix treatment for electron spins and perturbation for nuclear ones).

katarkon wrote:I suggest that spin system with 29 nuclei is extremely large. Firstly, all of C nuclei may be droped. Secondly, other nuclei with small HFC constants may be excluded too. The functions nucspinrmv or nucspinkeep may help in this. At third, I don't shure that perturbation method is appropriate choise for systems with S=1. I suggest that hybrid method should be used (matrix treatment for electron spins and perturbation for nuclear ones).

thank you.

I suggest that spin system with 29 nuclei is extremely large.

Yes, most likely, the computer can't even store the Hamiltonian in Matrix Form, as the dimension is (2^30)x(2^30) (if all spins are 1/2).