I am not sure if I get your question correctly. But for CW spectra, with weak perturbation, there is no need for a rotating frame transformation afaik.
Search found 25 matches
- Tue Aug 24, 2021 6:37 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Simulating "Forbidden" Half-Field Transitions with Dipolar Interactions
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3779
- Thu May 27, 2021 4:23 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Quadrupolar interaction Hamiltonian
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3211
Re: Quadrupolar interaction Hamiltonian
The clarification in the documentation how to convert to the principal Q-values somehow confused me more than it clarified. the Q in eeQqh = 1; % MHz eta = 0.2; % unitless I = 1; % nuclear spin must be known! Q = eeQqh/(4*I*(2*I-1)) * [-1+eta, -1-eta, 2] is NOT what one should put into Sys.Q. Sorry ...
- Tue Feb 09, 2021 1:54 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Quadrupolar interaction Hamiltonian
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3211
Re: Quadrupolar interaction Hamiltonian
This is what the documentation says: https://easyspin.org/easyspin/documenta ... tem.html#Q
Code: Select all
eeQqh = 1; % MHz
eta = 0.2; % unitless
I = 1; % nuclear spin must be known!
Q = eeQqh/(4*I*(2*I-1)) * [-1+eta, -1-eta, 2]
so as I see it it includes 4I(2I-1) if you put it into Q.
- Fri Jan 15, 2021 6:43 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: excitation profiles of a sequence of pulses
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3632
Re: excitation profiles of a sequence of pulses
hi, well, the question is a bit, what you want to achieve with this? A not super correct, but usually sufficient approach would be to just multiply the different exciation profiles. In principle, you could define the whole sequence in a single waveform, then use https://easyspin.org/easyspin/documen...
- Wed Jan 13, 2021 6:51 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: excitation profiles of a sequence of pulses
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3632
Re: excitation profiles of a sequence of pulses
Can't you just define a pulse shape that includes all the pulses and delays?
- Mon May 04, 2020 7:13 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Calcite anyone?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3703
Re: Calcite anyone?
Hi Johnn,
it is taken care of automatically when you specify the nucleus in the System structure and the field in the Experiment structure.
it is taken care of automatically when you specify the nucleus in the System structure and the field in the Experiment structure.
- Fri Feb 28, 2020 4:59 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: 2D EDNMR Simulation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2535
Re: 2D EDNMR Simulation
With 2D you mean that you use 2 different ELDOR frequencies and 2 HTA pulses? I don't think there is an EasySpin version for this available. It depends on how sophisticated you want to go. I once wrote a script to simulate the 2D version of the chirp-echo detected version of EDNMR, but that was some...
- Wed Jul 24, 2019 9:33 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Nuclear spin forbidden transitions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1933
Re: Nuclear spin forbidden transitions
Please post a minimal example of your script. What parameters do you use?
- Fri Jun 14, 2019 12:33 am
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Saffron 15N 3P Eseem, high hfcc?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6865
Re: Saffron 15N 3P Eseem, high hfcc?
1) you can fit them in whatever way you want? you can simply write your own function that uses saffron and then does the processing you want and then you can use esfit. Or I think you can use the fitOption that the FTs are fitted, not completely sure about that. 2) I think usually the FTs of differe...
- Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:20 am
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Saffron 15N 3P Eseem, high hfcc?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6865
Re: Saffron 15N 3P Eseem, high hfcc?
Honestly I cannot really help. It also depends on how the Pulse sequence and axis was exactly defined in your Bruker PulseSpel script. In the end, does it really matter? it's just a time shift, and usually you would compare the Magnitude FTs anyway, where the time shift should not really matter, rig...