Search found 23 matches
- Fri Jan 27, 2017 10:51 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Nutation Frequency simulation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2729
Re: Nutation Frequency simulation
Dear EasySpin team, I would like to simulate a orientation selective transient nutation experiment on high-spin systems. My code is below based on evolve(). It runs, but I don't observe a nutation frequency. It looks just noisy. I have tried to change the knots and tried different magnetic fields. I...
- Fri Jul 08, 2016 10:08 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Simulation with rotational barrier
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4102
Re: Simulation with rotational barrier
Ok.
Thank you.
Thank you.
- Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:01 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Simulation with rotational barrier
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4102
Re: Simulation with rotational barrier
Hi,
Opt.PostConvNucs works by removing the linewidth. But I receive the same error massage by applying Sys.lambda.:
Error using chili (line 451)
Ordering potential not supported for Opt.LiouvMethod='general'.
Opt.PostConvNucs works by removing the linewidth. But I receive the same error massage by applying Sys.lambda.:
Error using chili (line 451)
Ordering potential not supported for Opt.LiouvMethod='general'.
- Thu Jul 07, 2016 8:09 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Simulation with rotational barrier
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4102
Re: Simulation with rotational barrier
sorry but both ways don't work. Maybe I've done something wrong: 1. Simulate with full SLE: %Define Spin-System Sys.S=1/2; Sys.g=2.0023; Sys.Nucs='1H,1H,1H'; Sys.lwpp=[0.2 0.2]; Sys.A=[-98 -62 -21;-97 -61 -20;102 102 102]; Sys.AFrame=[2 30 102;-15 30 -62;0 0 0]*pi/180; Sys.logtcorr=-9; Sys.lambda=2;...
- Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:46 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Simulation with rotational barrier
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4102
Re: Simulation with rotational barrier
Thanks for your answer. I have explained something wrong. I have two rhombic HFS tensors rotating around the same dihedral angle. But there is thrid nucleus (quit isotropic HFS) which is not rotating. When I run chili with all three nuclei, it does not work. Is there a way to simulate this system wi...
- Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:22 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Simulation with rotational barrier
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4102
Simulation with rotational barrier
Hi, I want to simulate a EPR spectra with chili. I expect two nuclei with highly rhombic HFS tensors. But they can do a hindered rotation due to a rotational barrier. Is it possible to manage this problem with chili? I think there is currently a hindered rotation implemented only for one nucleus wit...
- Thu May 19, 2016 1:39 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: non ideal pulses with saffron
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2772
- Wed May 18, 2016 8:15 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: non ideal pulses with saffron
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2772
Re: non ideal pulses with saffron
Thanks you very much.
Last question:
Is the last value in Exp.t the delay from the last pulse to the echo?
Last question:
Is the last value in Exp.t the delay from the last pulse to the echo?
- Thu May 12, 2016 9:39 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Pepper: Default value of Opt.nKnots
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3222
Re: Pepper: Default value of Opt.nKnots
Simulating solid-state cw EPR spectra.....
The higher nKnots, the finer the orientational grid. The default value of 19 (5-degree increments) is appropriate for most systems. A value larger than 181 (0.5-degree increments) is rarely needed.
The higher nKnots, the finer the orientational grid. The default value of 19 (5-degree increments) is appropriate for most systems. A value larger than 181 (0.5-degree increments) is rarely needed.
- Thu May 12, 2016 9:16 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: non ideal pulses with saffron
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2772
non ideal pulses with saffron
Dear easyspin team, 1. By using a user defined pulse sequence in saffron, what is the definition of the inital pulse deplays (Exp.t)? Are these the values from the beginning of one pulse to the beginning of the next pulse, or from the end of one pulse to the beginning of the next pulse? 2. Is the Op...