Search found 10 matches
- Sun Oct 01, 2023 3:38 am
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Potential bug with curry soc
- Replies: 2
- Views: 15109
Re: Potential bug with curry soc
Dear Mauro, dear Stefan, it looks like the problem is in the way ES deals with the Zeeman effect of the orbital angular momentum, which is apparently fixed at gL=-1 instead of the correct gL=1. This is quite clear if one calculates the same system assuming two spins (of which one simulates an orbita...
- Mon May 28, 2018 1:32 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Unexpected powder spectra after rotation of reference frames
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1906
Re: Unexpected powder spectra after rotation of reference fr
Dear Stefan,
thanks a lot for the identification of the typo, and of the bug. I will download the new version as soon as possible.
thanks a lot for the identification of the typo, and of the bug. I will download the new version as soon as possible.
- Fri May 25, 2018 6:31 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Unexpected powder spectra after rotation of reference frames
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1906
Unexpected powder spectra after rotation of reference frames
Dear all, I am performing some preliminary test to simulate spectra of an exchange-coupled pair of largely anisotropic effective doublets. The relevant hamiltonian is then H= B(g1*S1+g2S2)+JS1S2+S1DS2. When simulating the powder spectrum with the code I include below I got two different patterns if ...
- Fri Jan 12, 2018 3:10 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Circular polarization
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2002
Re: Circular polarization
Thanks a lot!
- Wed Jan 10, 2018 4:05 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Circular polarization
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2002
Circular polarization
Is the possibility of using the circular polarization of mw, when simulating cw spectra, still allowed in ES? I remember this was introduced in a previous version of ES (5.0.0, as from release notes) but in the documentation of the current release there is no indication about this, and only 'perpend...
- Mon Jun 05, 2017 2:57 am
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: minor issue using Sys.eeD
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5611
Re: minor issue using Sys.eeD
Dear Stefan, thanks. My point was however a different one: in the example I included Sys.eeD is indeed traceless (-3.1 1.6 1.5), but this produces an error message anyhow. It looks like Sys.eeD has to be in the form [1 1 -2]*const or any permutation of it, i.e. axially symmetric, for the error messa...
- Thu Jun 01, 2017 1:18 am
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: minor issue using Sys.eeD
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5611
minor issue using Sys.eeD
Dear all, I just realized that pepper is issuing an error message whenever the dipolar component of the interaction matrix, given as Sys.eeD, is not axial. The error however refers to non-zero trace, which is not the case (see below). %%%%% V_MA119t11.eeD=[-3.1e-3 1.6e-3 1.5e-3]*29979 Error using pe...
- Tue May 30, 2017 12:28 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Exchange- and hyperfine- coupled systems
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3686
Re: Exchange- and hyperfine- coupled systems
Thanks a lot, that is completely clear now.
- Mon May 29, 2017 9:35 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Exchange- and hyperfine- coupled systems
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3686
Re: Exchange- and hyperfine- coupled systems
Dear Stefan, many thanks for your indications. I agree with you that two spins S=1/2 with zero interaction are providing a different energy pattern compared to a single spin S=1/2, and the same is true for two S=1/2, I=7/2 compared to a single one. However, the EPR spectrum the two S=1/2 give in you...
- Thu May 25, 2017 9:29 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Exchange- and hyperfine- coupled systems
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3686
Exchange- and hyperfine- coupled systems
Dear all, I am having some troubles in understanding the way ES handle the case of a pair of exchange coupled spin centers with hyperfine coupling. I used the following input to simulate a pair of S=1/2, I=7/2 with isotropic interaction. The hyperfine interaction is internded to be localized on each...