Search found 5 matches
- Sat Jul 04, 2015 3:01 pm
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Hamiltonian matrix labeling
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7605
Re: Hamiltonian matrix labeling
The final result however should not depend on the coupling order of the spins. The code that I posted previously to calculate the CG coefficient matrix for a three spins system was wrong, and that's why the results were not good if the first two spins are coupled antiferromagneticaly. The code below...
- Thu Jul 02, 2015 2:25 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Hamiltonian matrix labeling
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7605
Re: Hamiltonian matrix labeling
Maybe my previous post was poorly stated. A better question is whether is possible to extend the cgmatrix to work with three (or more) spins or just take as argument the vector returned by the spinvec function.
- Sun Jun 28, 2015 2:42 pm
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Hamiltonian matrix labeling
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7605
Re: Hamiltonian matrix labeling
I used the code that you posted for a more complex system. The goal is to transform the states of a system containing three spins: two electron and one nuclear. If the electron spins couple ferromagnetically, the eigenvectors of the states resulted from the coupling of this spin state to the nuclear...
- Wed Jun 17, 2015 12:05 pm
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Hamiltonian matrix labeling
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7605
Re: Hamiltonian matrix labeling
What about a system containing two coupled electron spins and a nuclear spin? If I consider your example and add a second spin 3/2, would the states be |1/2, 3/2, 1>, |1/2, 3/2, 0>, |1/2, 3/2, -1>, |1/2, 1/2, 1> etc. While it might be a very borderline usage scenario for EasySpin, I was wondering if...
- Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:09 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Hamiltonian matrix labeling
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7605
Hamiltonian matrix labeling
I would like to further analyze the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a spin Hamiltonian, but to do this I need to know how are the base states ordered. For example, in a S=1/2 and I=3/2 system, at zero field, does the labeling go |-1/2 -3/2>, |-1/2 -1/2> or in a different way? Thanks.