Nuclear Zeeman artefact?

A place to report and discuss potential bugs
Post Reply
IronPhoenix
User
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:01 pm

Nuclear Zeeman artefact?

Post by IronPhoenix »

In the following simplified example I find that switching from Opt.Method = 'hybrid' (or 'perturb2') to 'matrix'
(inclusion of nuclear Zeeman interaction) produces some small peaks a low frequencies.
I can not imagine how these should be related to an electronic spin flip.
Is this an artefact from the inclusion of the nuclear Zeeman interaction?

I would attach the files for the spectra if somebody showed me how to do this.

Sys = struct('S',1/2,'g',2,'lw',0.01);

Sys = nucspinadd(Sys,'9Be',[40 40 40]);

Exp.Field = 5;
Exp.mwCenterSweep = [0.15 0.3];
Exp.CrystalOrientation = [0 0 0];

Opt.Method = 'hybrid';

Opt.Verbosity = 1;

[x,y] = pepper(Sys,Exp,Opt);

x = x*1000;

plot(x,y,'b');
hold;

xlabel('Microwave frequency [MHz]');
ylabel('Normalised Intensity');

Stefan Stoll
EasySpin Creator
Posts: 1050
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 10:11 pm
Location: University of Washington

Re: Nuclear Zeeman artefact?

Post by Stefan Stoll »

The four low-frequency lines you see are from the six nuclear transitions. With matrix diagonalization, they are found, but with perturbation theory, they are not included.

To see this, use the following after your code:

Code: Select all

levelsplot(Sys,'z',[0 2*Exp.Field]);
xline(Exp.Field)

[frq,amp,~,transitions] = resfreqs_matrix(Sys,Exp);
resdata = [frq amp transitions];
sortrows(resdata)
Post Reply