Search found 134 matches

by Matt Krzyaniak
Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:49 am
Forum: General forum
Topic: Double integral values in EasySpin vs. Xenon
Replies: 4
Views: 3539

Re: Double integral values in EasySpin vs. Xenon

I see three potential sources for the differences. The first, you're using cumsum and sum , you forgot to weight the integral with the field step size (look at Stefan's example). But if you're consistent, field range and number of points always the same, it doesn't really matter. The second do origi...
by Matt Krzyaniak
Mon Sep 07, 2020 2:23 pm
Forum: General forum
Topic: Number of points affects resonance position
Replies: 4
Views: 2644

Re: Number of points affects resonance position

This is an issue with the binning of the datapoints when you are under-sampling to this extent. Resfields calculates the resonant field position, that in-turn gets interpolated to fit your desired field range and number of points. Try setting your linewidth to zero and the harmonic to zero. What end...
by Matt Krzyaniak
Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:12 am
Forum: General forum
Topic: Exporting Simulated Data
Replies: 2
Views: 1915

Re: Exporting Simulated Data

B correspond to the abscissa of the simulation, most of the simulation functions provide both the x axis and the y axis as outputs, presumably spc if the y axis, so just change whatever you have the x axis output into.
by Matt Krzyaniak
Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:18 am
Forum: General forum
Topic: ESEEM simulation problem
Replies: 4
Views: 2235

Re: ESEEM simulation problem

1. You calculated your excitation width in MHz Exp.ExciteWidth = 1000/32; so then just use the built in function mhz2mt(1000/32) to get an estimate of your excitewidth in field units. 2. With respect to increasing the bandwidth of your excitation, that is experimentally determined. However you do ne...
by Matt Krzyaniak
Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:59 am
Forum: General forum
Topic: ESEEM simulation problem
Replies: 4
Views: 2235

Re: ESEEM simulation problem

You need to either increase your excitation width or move the field/frequency. Where you are trying to simulated the ESEEM is just outside the spectrum. clear Sys.S = 1/2; Sys.g = [2.613 2.113 2.030]; Exp.mwFreq = 33.986; pepper(Sys,Exp) The highfield feature is at 1198 mT and your excitation width ...
by Matt Krzyaniak
Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:17 am
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Undefined function or variable 'eprload'
Replies: 1
Views: 2509

Re: Undefined function or variable 'eprload'

If you could provide us with an example d01 file, we can modify eprload appropriately.
by Matt Krzyaniak
Fri Mar 16, 2018 9:36 am
Forum: Bugs
Topic: discrepancy between pepper and esfit simulation
Replies: 4
Views: 3302

Re: discrepancy between pepper and esfit simulation

Your simulation magnetic field range doesn't match with your experimental range. Usually its best to pull those from the actual experimental parameters so you don't run into errors. clear; [B_exp,spc_exp,Params]=eprload('BE3_P2M1_G30_chp_large-bl.DTA'); B_exp = B_exp/10; Sys.S = 1/2; Sys.g = [2.06 2...
by Matt Krzyaniak
Fri Mar 16, 2018 9:12 am
Forum: Bugs
Topic: discrepancy between pepper and esfit simulation
Replies: 4
Views: 3302

Re: discrepancy between pepper and esfit simulation

You'll also need to include the .dsc file.
by Matt Krzyaniak
Tue Mar 06, 2018 8:29 am
Forum: General forum
Topic: Hyperfinesplitting drawing program
Replies: 10
Views: 4901

Re: Hyperfinesplitting drawing program

moreutz wrote:Thank you very much!
Unfortunately I have an natural isoptope mixture (Sys.Nucs = 'N,H')..
For both N and H you generally don't need to worry about natural isotope mixtures, as their isotope abundances <<1%.
by Matt Krzyaniak
Mon Feb 26, 2018 9:29 am
Forum: General forum
Topic: Different intensities between experimental spectrum and simu
Replies: 1
Views: 1082

Re: Different intensities between experimental spectrum and

You can use the rescale function to scale your simulation to best match your experimental spectrum.