Can you post the script you have used and an image of the results?
Search found 242 matches
- Fri Apr 21, 2023 5:50 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: X axis shifted after fit
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1640
- Wed Apr 19, 2023 2:03 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Script for mT to g-factor Conversion
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7214
Re: Script for mT to g-factor Conversion
Something like:
Code: Select all
g = 714.477*Exp.mwFreq./Bmight do the trick, where B is the magnetic field vector.
- Thu Apr 06, 2023 2:37 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Uncertainties calculations and reporting
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3746
Uncertainties calculations and reporting
One of the features I was most happy to see in the new esfit version (and one often requested by reviewers) is the uncertainty calculation of fitted parameters. Of course, it is also the case that most ES users (or of other software for that matter), including myself, are not fully trained in the de...
- Sun Mar 12, 2023 12:01 am
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: New esfit does not recognize FitOpt.Baseline argument
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9019
New esfit does not recognize FitOpt.Baseline argument
Using FitOpt.Baseline = 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 is not recognized by the GUI window.
The esfit window always starts from "Baseline none" and the baseline type needs to be manually defined.
This is in version 6.0.0-dev.51
- Thu Mar 02, 2023 8:21 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Cryptic error message in new esfit
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5178
Re: Cryptic error message in new esfit
OK, problem corrected.
I just needed to correct rescale to rescaledata in the helper function!
- Wed Mar 01, 2023 11:40 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Cryptic error message in new esfit
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5178
Cryptic error message in new esfit
I just started to dabble with the new esfit. I am trying to modify an existing script using an external function. After the basic syntax changes were done, the fitting window pops up, the fitting intervals and options are recognized correctly, but when I launch the fit, I get an error message: Simul...
- Mon Feb 20, 2023 1:05 am
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Easyspin version ID missing
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7951
Easyspin version ID missing
The Easyspin version ID is missing from the zip files downloaded from git, whereas this is present in the zip files downloaded from https://easyspin.org/.
Maybe this is not a bug but a feature?
- Mon Feb 06, 2023 7:20 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Transition probabilities vs turning angles
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5537
Re: Transition probabilities vs turning angles
The error must be associated with the ee-interaction term. When trying with a 1-spin system, the error disappeared, but another one popped up: Attempt to grow array along ambiguous dimension. Error in saffron (line 1256) SyLab(rmvTransition~=0) = 0; Error in saffron (line 237) [x,y_,out] = saffron(S...
- Mon Feb 06, 2023 4:14 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Transition probabilities vs turning angles
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5537
Re: Transition probabilities vs turning angles
I have also been trying saffron along these lines. There is an error I get for the above system: Error using saffron>rotatesystem (line 2342) Reference to non-existent field 'eeFrame'. Error in saffron (line 1993) parfor iOrientation = 1 : nOrientations Error in twopecho_dimer_saffron (line 119) [x,...
- Mon Feb 06, 2023 3:32 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Transition probabilities vs turning angles
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5537
Re: Transition probabilities vs turning angles
Dear Stefan, Taking you up on your advice, I looked at the examples. The closest one I could find was the 2pEcho simulation using the density matrix . I tried looping through various field values of a field-swept experiment, but I guess this is not what you suggest. Since the relevant part of the ec...