Search found 19 matches
- Thu May 16, 2024 1:54 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Spectra from Orca Calculation with many hydrogens
- Replies: 2
- Views: 46
Re: Spectra from Orca Calculation with many hydrogens
Hi Sebastian, garlic supports equivalent nuclei, which can be many without much computation time when the correlation time is omitted. See example for 2 nitrogens and 12 protons: Sys.g = [2.0084 2.0063 2.0024]; Sys.Nucs = '14N,1H'; Sys.n = [2,12]; Sys.A = [110, 5]; Sys.lwpp = 0.1; Exp.mwFreq = 9.5; ...
- Thu Dec 14, 2023 9:33 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: esfit error in timecorrelation fitting
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7819
Re: esfit error in timecorrelation fitting
Hi, Are you using the same EasySpin Version in both Windows and Mac? You can find out simply using the command "easyspin". The error indicates your input arguments to esfit might have the wrong format on Mac. You can check the documentation entry of esfit for the EasySpin version you are u...
- Wed Oct 18, 2023 4:02 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: orca2easyspin cannot access output file
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5591
Re: orca2easyspin cannot access output file
Dear SheaStew, just having double checked with some of my Orca output: You can either give the full property txt file with ending .txt: Sys = orca2easyspin('gtensor_calc_property.txt') or you can also read in the full Orca output file, also in txt/ascii format: Sys = orca2easyspin('gtensor_calc.log'...
- Thu Oct 05, 2023 12:22 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Pepper and separate output
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5075
Re: Pepper and separate output
Dear Yukky, changing the requested output to separate transitions changes the format of the returned data: Instead of the single spectrum, a vector with 1x1024 elements, with Opt.Output = 'separate' you get a spectrum for each transition. All the separate spectra are lined up in a matrix with N_tran...
- Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:54 pm
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: error dot indexing
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5559
Re: error dot indexing
Dear Ranjana, it sounds to me as if your Vary variable is already assigned to a type other than struct before you execute that line of code. You could add either "clear Vary;" or "Vary = struct()"; before to remove the previous assignment. Otherwise, please consider posting more ...
- Fri Sep 08, 2023 11:27 pm
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: How to Simulate a Mixed-Spin State of HS and IS with Quantum Admixture?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5356
Re: How to Simulate a Mixed-Spin State of HS and IS with Quantum Admixture?
Hi Maruan, the third point mentioned should take you there: You have two options: 1) you can either define a Spin System with two electron spins coupled by exchange and dipolar electron-electron interactions 2) or you can specify the larger Group Spin, S = S1 + S2, and a zero-field splitting, both d...
- Wed Sep 06, 2023 8:14 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: How to Simulate a Mixed-Spin State of HS and IS with Quantum Admixture?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5356
Re: How to Simulate a Mixed-Spin State of HS and IS with Quantum Admixture?
Hi Maruan, as I understand your question, the first step would be to simulate solid state cw EPR spectra with the two spin state of Fe, so S=3/2 and S=5/2. The EasySpin example with high spin Cr(III) should be a good starting point for you, you can find it here: https://easyspin.org/easyspin/example...
- Wed Aug 23, 2023 1:09 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: About the fitting of multiple radicals
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2112
Re: About the fitting of multiple radicals
Hello, for your case of such a mix of species, you might want to stick to the literature g & A values for the different radicals that you suspect are in the mix. A key point is to identify those. (Ideal would be experiments where individual species dominate when possible) Your model is correct i...
- Mon Feb 20, 2023 4:20 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Simulation fits better at lower g-values
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1774
Re: Simulation fits better at lower g-values
Dear Maria, Did you consider any means for removing the magnetic field offset? E.g. by also measuring the cw EPR spectrum of a reference sample of known g-value such as DPPH. Otherwise the magnetic field offset will appear as a "g offset" in the simulation. Since electro magnets have a sof...
- Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:09 am
- Forum: General forum
- Topic: Fitting for Cu mixed oxide
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1133
Re: Fitting for Cu mixed oxide
Dear Xiaoyu, first it looks like you have the magnetic field value in Gauss, whereas EasySpin works in mT, so as a second line I would add the conversion: B = B./10; % conversion G to mT The microwave frequency was very approximate with 9.8, better use the full 9.825671 GHz. Under these conditions A...